Okay, so. my head is spinning a bit...though it makes (mostly) sense. What I am really enjoying about this, though, is the pictures of all the gorgeous colors that pop, regardless of why/how genetically!No. If the diluted black gene is present, it is VISIBLE and the bird is blue or splash (2 copies). It's possible (likely) it started that way as a genetic mutation/defect, but relying on that when purposefully breeding, doesn't work very well.
Breeding Black and Blue can get Blue 50% of the time BECAUSE the Blue comes from the Blue parent.
Black can be thought of as NOT Blue. For Blue to be seen, it HAS to be one Blue and one Not Blue. Splash is one Blue and one Blue. Black is one Not Blue and one Not Blue
Going back to my birds
PITA and Blanche are both Blue and Blue.
Therefore ALL their offspring will get Blue from mama. What each of those offspring get from papa, depends upon papa. Cheetah (skipping the other colors he has) is Not Blue and Not Blue.
View attachment 4020223
All of his offspring will get Not Blue from him.
Lark and Indigo show Blue because they have to be Not Blue AND Blue.
View attachment 4020224View attachment 4020225View attachment 4020227whView attachment 4020226when both girls got the Not Blue from their daddy, they also got some leakage of other colors in the orange.
Zulu, Cheetah's offspring by one of his blue daughters got Not Blue (with other colors) and Blue (with other colors)View attachment 4020228View attachment 4020230He also got the rooster color vibrancy of being ZZ (roo genetics) rather than the ZW of hen genetics. The Z tends to carry much of the color, explaining why roos are more vibrant than hens (double whammy). Would have been interesting to see how his genetics would have played out, but due to the presence of his mother, grandmother and father/grandfather, he was on the rehome/freezer list.
Still wondering how he got willow green legs from grandparents' blue legs....but from what I've read, legs genetics are semi-unpredictable.


