I simply do not understand how people can just let their dogs roam free. Its ignorant no matter what the breed is. People like that should not be allowed to own dogs. Where I live, dogs dont roam free, its just not allowed, by the owner or neighbors. In farming country, a roaming dog who chases livestock/maimes livestock is shot at first with a warning shot and the owners are contacted, 2nd with pepper shot to warn the dog, 3rd no dog.
Oblio13, I have never in my life seen a mean Great Dane. I just simply didnt think they had it in them. They are wonderful loving giants. I have a very funny story to tell you about a harlequin dane..
I agree with everyone who stated it is not the breed of dog that is dangerous. Some dogs do need "stronger owners" than others. Some owners just don't have it in them, to constantly remain the "alpha" leader.
Three years ago, I adopted a lab/border collie cross who spent tje first 1.5 yrs of his life in a shelter. He was dropped off because he is scared of guns. He is the sweetest dog, ever. Loves my doxies, grooms my cats, ignores the guineas, learning about the chicks. He has his odd quirks and his routine. But....I do not trust him around strangers, if I am home. He will circle around behind the person and nip them on the back of the leg. He has done this successfully a few too many times. He loves kids and will not do this to kids. In fact his energetic behavior ceases when young kids are around. If I am not home, he will keep his distance and bark. I am a responsible pet owner. I take him back when strangers (to him) are here and let him calm down before allowing him to meet new people. He is a sneaky biter....due to the border collie in him. I dont think he is viscious but I know what he will do.
It does not matter what breed a dog is, a viscious dog will be a viscious dog. Granted some breeds are capable of doing more bodily harm than others. Its not the breed, its the owners. If you are a lovey, animal weakling, push over like me...you simply do not need a strong breed dog.