I think of it slightly differently. Chickens 'in the wild' live and die and get injured and get eaten. And that is what it is. However, once any one of us takes on responsibility for an animal we have some level of duty of care. Yours are semi-wild so you duty of care is very different from mine because I introduced chickens into my yard knowing that with all the foxes and raccoons they wouldn't last a minute on their own. So I build a coop and a run (aka Chicken Palace) so I can protect them. Does that make sense to anyone?
I find it interesting. We wouldn't want our children to always be completely dependent on us & I have something of the same mindset with animals. As much freedom & independence as possible with as much safety & provision as needed. A happy medium. There is always some risk. Every time my girls leave the pen they run a risk ~ everything from hawks to stray dogs, snakes & lizards ~ & certainly my big girls know those things are around & keep a watchful eye out. It's not just that they are happier within themselves, the learning makes them smarter, more aware of their surroundings, & far more likely to survive if the unexpected happens.
 
Notch with Donk and Donk's daughter Knock.
P4033042.JPG
 
I find it interesting. We wouldn't want our children to always be completely dependent on us & I have something of the same mindset with animals. As much freedom & independence as possible with as much safety & provision as needed. A happy medium. There is always some risk. Every time my girls leave the pen they run a risk ~ everything from hawks to stray dogs, snakes & lizards ~ & certainly my big girls know those things are around & keep a watchful eye out. It's not just that they are happier within themselves, the learning makes them smarter, more aware of their surroundings, & far more likely to survive if the unexpected happens.
I think ultimately it's each person's moral compass, as shaped by thinking and reading and conversation across a wide field of topics, that determines the care they try to provide for animals. I my case the mix is childhood catholicism and 70s television (family and good will centric), Australian culture (we're in it together, fun, with a touch of laissez faire), readings in science and more lately the humanities that make up my own special blend.
 
I think ultimately it's each person's moral compass, as shaped by thinking and reading and conversation across a wide field of topics, that determines the care they try to provide for animals. I my case the mix is childhood catholicism and 70s television (family and good will centric), Australian culture (we're in it together, fun, with a touch of laissez faire), readings in science and more lately the humanities that make up my own special blend.
This is probably true. I am a completely different generation ~ ie I don't think we're all in this together :lau ~ how can we be? The introverts amongst us are celebrating :gig~ & far more impacted by 3 wars: WWII, Korea & Vietnam. I'm humanities centred rather than science so I tend to be very big picture thinking. Nothing new under the sun so what work best for the greatest number & how best to keep individual freedoms? It is a very different mindset & when I was @ university brought about biggest clashes between the humanities & the sciences.

I was lucky. My best buddy was majoring in biology & animal behaviour [her minor was English Lit] so I got stuff explained to me in a way I could understand ~ & some great reading that bridged the gulf.
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom