It’s the kitten.
I’m sorry. Should I have gotten an “extra” pet so soon after getting the planned puppy- but after the unexpected death of our cat?
Probably not just in case of unforeseen stuff....
And doesn’t it figure that the one kitten who grabbed my heartstrings was one who, a month into it, turned out to have a gosh darn mystery illness?!?
I was not expecting or prepared to drop $1500 (and counting) on a $50 rescue kitten in the first 3 months of ownership.
Euthanizing him for lack of answers was not an option.
The issue at hand is a small one. (@pitbullmomma don’t come hit me!)
He got the first two fvrcp immunizations from the rescue group.
They said he needed 1 more and his rabies at 4 months. (Nc law)
When I took him for his 1st vet visit, they said they don’t trust the rescue groups vaccines and wanted to start over.
So I agreed to have him tested for fe-luk/aids and get those vaccines too.
The short story is the shot series has been started and suspended numerous times because of his mystery illness -which currently seems to have spontaneously resolved-
After the hurricane I called to notify them that the rash was gone and I wanted to take advantage of that window and get his vaccines finished up.
So when I made the appointment I let the scheduling secretary tell me which one to get first -because she said they don’t give them together.
She said rabies first.
So we did that last week.
The other day I got a call from their head tech who said the two doctors were looking at his chart. (Idk why)
And it appears that now he’s missed the window for the final fvrcp, (AGAIN!) so now he needs 2 more!
All in all he’s had 5 fvrcp’s so far, so Now he’ll have SEVEN, by the time they consider him done.
I am very concerned about this.
No hitting from me, Stace!
When I was a practicing vet, I used to get into it all the time with my first, awful, boss cuz he wanted to vaccinate every cat and dog with the maximal amount of vaccines whether it was warranted or not. I, OTOH would assess each patient's needs and only give what I and the owner felt was warranted. If it was a little dog I would bring them back to split up vaccines, at no additional charge, because it was safer.
He used to get pissed off at me for doing that--loss of money for the practice--but I never lost a pet to vaccination.
A couple weeks ago, my neighbor across the street (who goes to him) told me his tiny 3 year old dog died after he took him to that taterhole. He administered a couple vaccines at once, and failed to treat the dog appropriately when Mike brought him back showing clear signs of anaphylaxis....I was so so upset....I despise that man, he was the worst vet ever!!!
I only vaccinate my dogs at the very minimum for what I feel they need appropriate to their lifestyle, and I always did the same with every dog or cat that came into my practice.
I hate vets who practive like this and I would never recommend someone taking their pet to this guy or Banfield or the like, because they have the same "one size fits all and vaccinate for everything, all at once" mentality as their business model. For real....
Anyways, not all vets are bad. There are plenty of us out there with ethics, morals, and who practice sound medicine while treating each patient as an individual (but of course, y'all already know that!) Just had to throw my respectful .02 cents in there.
Edited--as always--for super-crappy too-fast typing!